Israel 2011: An 'Impossible'  Peace by Jack Kinsella-Omega letter 
After days of violence between  Israelis and Palestinians and accelerated rocket attacks on southern Israel from  Hamas-led Gaza strip, Israel’s foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman declared on  Sunday that “peace was impossible” suggesting Israel should seek a less lofty  goal and cut their losses.
The latest eruption between the two  sides followed the continuing violence along the Israel-Gaza border. Lieberman  told a conference of Israeli diplomats that instead of a full peace deal, Israel  should seek a long-term, interim agreement on security and economic  matters.
"It's not only that it is impossible"  to reach an overall agreement, he said. "It is simply forbidden."
Lieberman said the West Bank  Palestinian Authority — with whom Israel has pledged to negotiate — is "not  legitimate" because it has postponed elections.
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas  remains in office though his term expired almost a year ago, and there is no  date for a new election.
Palestinians have consistently  rejected that approach.
Lieberman has a reputation for  expressing hard-line views that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu can’t,  allowing him to float alternative plans while officially sticking to the premise  of a final, negotiated peace settlement between the two sides.
Consequently statement from  Netanyahu's office said Lieberman's comments reflect "his personal positions,"  not those of the government.  
Peace talks were making progress  until Obama switched sides and demanded that Israel cease all construction in  Jerusalem.
Obama was eager to make his mark  early and earn the Peace Prize awarded him for being black two weeks into his  presidency.Being clueless from Chicago, he didn’t know that his demands  immediately are transformed into the Palestinian  default position.
So when he later tried to walk that  back, the Palestinians wouldn’t let him.   Now the Palestinians say  that they will not negotiate as long as Israel builds homes for Jews on any land  they claim for their proposed state.
That’s what makes further  negotiations “impossible” since it requires an Israeli capitulation over the  issue in dispute before they will negotiate the issue in dispute.   
Like agreeing on the final price  first – as a condition of haggling over the price.   It  impossible.
Because the PA is unelected, the only  legally-elected representative of the Palestinian people with whom  Israel could credibly negotiate would be Hamas. 
Hamas exists by charter for the  express purpose of annihilating Israel.   Hamas is a terrorist  organization with whom negotiation is forbidden.
So peace is impossible. Israel has no  credible negotiating partner. For that reason, French Foreign Minister Bernard  Koucher had already discussed a unilateral declaration of Palestinian statehood  regardless of the outcome of negotiations with Israel. 
That information came to  light as part of the overall Wikileaks document dump.  According to a  ‘secret’ (so to speak) cable written by US  Ambassador to France to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton:
   "The French agree with us on the need to help    [Palestinian Authority] President [Mahmoud] Abbas return to the negotiating    table by offering assistance programs, guarantees, and the support of Arab    leaders. However Kouchner also mentioned to SE [George] Mitchell the    controversial idea of offering to recognize a Palestinian state now, with    undefined borders, or offering to recognize a Palestinian state within a    defined timeline, regardless of the outcome of  negotiation.”
The Wikileaks cable says that Brazil,  Argentina, Bolivia and Uruguay have already decided on formally recognizing a  fully independent Palestinian state within the 1967 (Green Line)  borders.
The Wikileaks plan somehow managed to  trigger some deep, almost forgotten practice within the US Congress. Some in the  Congress actually read the Wikileaks documents.  Having read them,  they sneaked by a bill of their own, passing a resolution opposing unilateral  steps aimed at a declaration of Palestinian statehood earlier this  month.
(We should have leaked the  TARP and Obamacare bills -- maybe they would have read them,  too!) 
Introduced by Rep Howard  Berman,[D-Ca) and then- chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Berman  moved to pass the resolution "supporting a negotiated solution to the  Israeli-Palestinian conflict and condemning unilateral measures to declare or  recognize a Palestinian state."
Palestinian Authority chief  negotiator Saeb Erekat slammed the action saying that;
   "through the passage of this resolution, the    US Congress is contradicting the policy of the American government to create a    Palestinian state by hindering the ability of the Palestinians to navigate    around the Israeli government's obstructionist  policies."
In other words, Congress is  obstructing the Palestinian ability to ignore its negotiating partners. And  they don't like it one bit.  So they're taking it to the  UN.
Last week, Palestinian Authority  leader Mahmoud Abbas announced his intention to ask the UN Security Council to  pass a resolution defining Jewish construction in Judea, Samaria and  Jerusalem as illegal. 
STOP  THERE!
Now go back up and read the sentence  above one more time, slowly.  Sound out every word until you have a  complete grasp of the thought being conveyed.
Mahmoud Abbas co-founded the PLO with  Yasser Arafat, the father of modern terrorism. 
His 'Palestinian  Authority' exists based on an agreement that if Israel will agree to  its existence, then the Palestinians will stop committing acts of  terror.
At no point along the way was  terrorism legalized or any of the innocent dead revived. The death, mayhem  and destruction wrought at the hands of Yasser Arafat, Mahmoud Abbas and the PLO  was never paid for in any legal sense, neither was there any blanket pardon  granted in any legal sense.
Mahmoud Abbas' term of office expired  two years ago.  So did the Palestinian Authority's, well,   authority.  The PA won't hold new elections because Hamas would  win. 
And because Hamas would win, nobody  is pressuring Abbas and Company to hold elections.
So, with no legal standing of its  own, the PA is asking for a resolution declaring a Jewish presence  in parts of Judea, Samaria or Jerusalem  illegal? 
Leaving aside the lack of standing on  the part of Abbas, where is the standing of the UN? Israel is a member-state of  the United Nations?
Chapter 1, Article 2, Paragraph  7 of the United Nations Charter reads as follows:  
   "Nothing contained in the present    Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which    are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall    require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present    Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement    measures under Chapter Vll."
The central question is whether this  is a domestic Israeli issue? Or an international issue involving Israel and an  second member state or country?  The question doesn't seem that  difficult.
Totally apart from any religious  tradition, history says that Jesus Christ was born a Jew, in Bethlehem, now  claimed as part of the Palestinian Authority.  
He was raised a Jew in Nazareth, now  claimed as part of the PA.  His ministry was to Jews living in Samaria,  Judea and Jerusalem, now claimed as part of the PA.
Jesus lived during the Roman  occupation of Judea, a period known to history through the writings of Flavius  Josephus as the "Wars of the Jews" because that's who lived in Jerusalem,  Judea and Samaria.  
The Romans conquered Judea from the  Greeks.  The Jews were there.  The Greeks conquered it from the  Persians. The Jews were there. The Persians conquered it from Babylon, who  conquered it from the Jews of Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria. 
Before that, Sargon the Assyria  conquered the Northern Kingdom of Israel.  Prior to the division of the  Northern and Southern Kingdoms, it was all called "Israel."  And  Jerusalem was founded by Israel's King David.
The UN's jurisdiction on behalf of  the Arab states is itself illegitimate.  The UN recognized Israel in  1948.  The Arab states declared war on Israel five times, each time leaving  Israel in possession of more territory.  Under the internationally  recognized right of conquest, the territory captured is then part of  Israel.
The "right of conquest" is  still the functioning basis for the existence of the United States, not to  mention ALL of the modern states of the Middle East.  All were part of the  Ottoman Empire until conquered by the Allies in WWI.  
Jordan's borders were drawn  by England in 1922, not the Jordanians.  The Jordanians attempted to  draw their own borders in 1967.  They hoped to extend them to the  Meditterranean Sea.  Instead, they were redrawn back to the Jordan  River. 
But the UN didn't do it.   Jordan did.  The West Bank wasn't lost by Jordan, it was recovered  by Israel.  Under the right of conquest, everything the UN has done  concerning Israel and the "Palestinians" is illegal under its own  charter.  
The United Nations came into  existence as a consequence of World War Two.  One reason was to prevent the  re-occurrence of forced deportations, ethnic cleansings and other forms of  genocide practiced by the Axis powers, especially in Nazi Germany.
The United Nations defines  "ethnic cleansing" this way:
   "a purposeful policy designed by one ethnic or    religious group to remove by violent and terror-inspiring means the civilian    population of another ethnic or religious group from certain geographic    areas."  
As part of his request that the UN  Security Council criminalize the presence of Jews in parts of Jerusalem, Samaria  and Judea, Abbas added the following  so there could be no mistake.
   “If there is an independent Palestinian state    with Jerusalem as its capital, we won’t agree to the presence of one Israeli    in it. When a Palestinian state is established, it would have no Israeli    presence.”
'A nation without the presence of a  single Israeli in it' -- by design.  The Nazis had a word for  that; "Judenrein" -- but the United Nations defines it as  "ethnic cleansing".  
Caroline Glick summarized the impossible position Israel finds itself in  as the books close on the year 2010.
   Secretary of State Hillary Clinton    signaled this month that the Obama administration is wholly on board Fatah’s    political warfare bandwagon. In her speech at the Brookings Institute on    December 10, she said the Obama administration supports Fatah’s plan to build    facts on the ground that will make it more difficult for Israel to maintain    its control over Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem.
After calling Jewish presence in    the areas “illegitimate,” Clinton pledged the US “will deepen our support of    the Palestinians’ state-building efforts.”
Among other things, she pledged to    continue training and deploying a Palestinian army in Judea and Samaria and    pressuring Israel to withdraw the IDF from the areas.
As she put it, “As the Palestinian    security forces continue to become more professional and capable, we look to    Israel to facilitate their efforts. And we hope to see a significant    curtailment of incursions by Israeli troops into Palestinian  areas.”
These then are the contours of the    Palestinians’ war plans for 2011. Hamas will launch an illegal missile war to    provoke an IDF campaign in Gaza. Iran, Syria, Hizbullah, Turkey, the UN and a    vast array of NGOs and leftist governments from Norway to Brazil will support    its illegal war.
Fatah will escalate its political    war. Its campaign will be supported by the US, the EU, the UN and a vast array    of NGOs and leftist governments.
The purpose of these two campaigns    – which complement one another and which will likely culminate at the UN in    September – is to weaken Israel militarily and politically with the shared    purpose of destroying it in the fullness of time.
That last statement is what caught my  eye.  The Gentile plan to take Jerusalem from the Jews and Glick's use of  the phrase,"in the fullness of time."
Jesus predicted the Roman sack of  Jerusalem, the Diaspora and the ultimate return of the Jews to their own land in  the last days.   He outlined the entire history in a single  sentence:
   “And they shall fall by the edge of the    sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be    trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be    fulfilled.” (Luke 21:24)
Jerusalem is in Israeli hands, but  it is still trodden down of the Gentiles.  For  now.  But all the signs point to this dispensation as rapidly winding to a  close.
   "That in the dispensation of the fulness    of times He might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are    in heaven, and which are on earth; even in Him:" (Ephesians    1:10)
As we begin the year  2010, there is little remaining reason to doubt that we are witnessing the  waning hours of the Dispensation of the fulness of times. Maybe this year.  Maybe next.  But soon.
And after that, the  Gathering!  
By Jack Kinsella - Omega Letter  Editor